Site Logo
FeaturesPricingBlogAbout

More

English

Start Chat

Case Study

Why V1 failed, in full detail

Most "we learned a lot" posts skip the actual mistakes. This is the specific, unflattering breakdown of what broke GrowsChat v1, and the decisions that shaped the rebuild.

11 months

Time v1 stayed live

$250

Peak monthly server cost

$0

Revenue at shutdown

What actually broke it

01

No rate limiting, anywhere

Free users could hammer the most expensive part of the infrastructure, voice and video calls, with zero limits. That directly drove the cost blowup.

02

No monetization plan

There was no free tier, no paid tier, no plan to offset infrastructure cost at all. Every user was pure cost, with no revenue on the other side.

03

Fully open source, by default

The entire codebase was public with no strategic reason for it to be. It gave away the product with nothing protecting the business behind it.

04

No SEO fundamentals

No robots.txt, no sitemap, nothing structured for discovery. Growth depended entirely on people already knowing the app existed.

What v2 does differently

01

Hard rate limits

Free voice and video calls are capped at 10 minutes, enforced server side, no exceptions.

02

Revenue from day one

A free tier with light ads, plus a paid tier for people who want more, built in before launch, not bolted on after.

03

Closed source

The codebase is private. What's public now is the story of building it, not the code itself.

04

SEO built in from the start

Sitemap, robots.txt, and structured content from day one, not an afterthought once growth stalled.

This is the version I actually stand behind

Try GrowsChatRead the full story